ADVERTORIAL
The Evening LedgerUnited States flagRead at Dusk
Family › Reading the Label37 min read

A Birthday Bottle From My Daughter, Read Before I Called to Thank Her

She mailed me a quart of Neurologic, a berry-flavored liquid taken two tablespoons at a time. I promised to call her Sunday, but first I wanted to know what she had bought.

A white-haired man at a rural mailbox at dusk drawing out a small brown parcel
Thursday, a little before seven. Thirty-one years of carrying other people's parcels, and this one had my name on it.

The parcel was in the mailbox on Thursday, a little before seven in the evening, when the light goes gold across the hayfield across the road.

It was a small brown box, taped at both ends, with my daughter's handwriting on the label and a return address three time zones west.

I turned sixty-nine that week.

She had called on the day itself, and she had said, near the end of the call, that something was on its way.

I knew the weight of it before I knew what it was.

For thirty-one years I carried the mail on a rural route in this county, and a man in that job learns to read a parcel with his hands.

This one was heavy for its size, and it sloshed.

Glass, I thought, and liquid, and a lot of it.

When I opened it at the porch table, there was a folded birthday card on top and a tall bottle underneath, wrapped in brown paper.

The card said what cards say, and then, in her smaller handwriting at the bottom, she asked me to take two tablespoons a day and to call her Sunday.

I have a rule about gifts. I don't say thank you for a thing until I know what it is.

So I left the bottle in its box, still wrapped, and I did not open it.

I gave myself four evenings, Thursday to Sunday, to find out what she had sent me.

Before I go on, one plain word about the people in this story.

The family details here are a composite, drawn from my own and from men I know, so that nobody is identified.

The bottle is real, and so are its label, the store that sells it and the studies I read.

Nobody in this story is quoted, and nobody is credited with any result from the bottle, because I don't have one to report.

What I do have is four evenings of notes.

I keep a notebook of the day, every evening on the porch, and I have kept one since the year I retired.

My late wife called it my evening ledger.

It holds the weather, the birds at the feeder, what I spent, who called, and anything I want to remember to ask somebody.

This week it held one bottle.

What follows is those four pages, written out longer than I wrote them, with the questions I asked in bold and the answers I found underneath.

An open brown parcel with packing paper, a closed birthday card and a notebook on a porch table at dusk
The porch table on Thursday evening. The card came out first. The rest stayed in its paper for four days.

Thirty-One Years of Other People's Parcels

A rural carrier sees a great many boxes go into a great many houses.

You learn, without meaning to, which houses get a box every week and which get one a year.

In my last ten years on the route, a certain kind of box started turning up more often.

It came from a son or a daughter in a city far away, and it went to a parent who lived alone at the end of a long drive.

Some of those boxes held books.

Some held a new telephone, the kind with big buttons, and a note asking the parent to please keep it charged.

And more and more of them held bottles.

I could tell by the weight and the sound, and sometimes by the name of the store printed on the tape.

I never knew what was in them, and it was never my business.

But I used to wonder, pulling away from a mailbox, whether the person inside would read the label or just start taking the thing because a child had sent it.

Now it was my turn at the end of the drive.

There is something particular about a bottle from a grown child.

It is not like a bottle you pick out yourself at the store, after reading the back and putting it down twice.

A bottle from a child comes with feelings attached.

It says she thought about you, that she worries a little, and that she spent money she might have spent on her own family.

Those are good things to be given.

They also make it harder to ask plain questions about what is actually in the glass.

I decided the kindest thing I could do for her was to ask them anyway.

If the bottle was worth taking, I would know why, and if it wasn't, I would know how to say so gently.

Weathered hands writing a short list with a pencil on the back page of a notebook at dusk
The back page of the notebook is where the questions go. This week there were seven of them.

The Rule My Mother Kept About Thank-You Notes

My mother wrote a thank-you note for every gift she ever got, and she made us do the same.

Her one rule was that the note had to say something true about the gift.

You could not write "thank you for the lovely present" and stop there.

You had to say what it was and what you were going to do with it, which meant you had to open it and look at it first.

I have kept that rule for sixty years.

It turns out to be a very good rule for a bottle of something you are supposed to swallow every day.

A thank-you that says something true about this bottle has to know a few things.

It has to know what it is, who makes it, what is in it, and what it can and cannot be expected to do.

It also has to know one practical thing that a gift-giver rarely thinks about.

What happens if the person who receives it doesn't want it?

A true thank-you needs the facts first. The feelings are already in the box.

So on Thursday evening, before supper, I turned to the back page of my notebook and wrote down seven questions.

They are the questions I would want answered about anything a child of mine sent me in a bottle.

  • What is it, in plain words?
  • Who makes it, and where are they?
  • What does the store say it does?
  • What is actually in it, line by line, and how much?
  • What did the studies of those ingredients find?
  • Is there anything I should show the pharmacist first?
  • If it doesn't suit me, what does it cost her?

Seven questions, four evenings.

I did the first two on Thursday, before I had even taken the bottle out of its paper.

Thursday Evening: What She Actually Bought

I don't own a computer, but my daughter set up a tablet for me two Christmases ago, and I can find a store's page on it as well as anybody.

The birthday card had the name of the product on it, in her handwriting, underlined twice.

What is it, in plain words?

It is called Neurologic, and it is made and sold by a company called Liquid Health.

It is a dietary supplement, sold as a liquid in a glass bottle that holds 32 fluid ounces.

Thirty-two fluid ounces is exactly one quart.

It is the same amount as the carton of half-and-half in my refrigerator, which gives you some idea of the size of the thing she mailed across the country.

The store sells it as a supplement for the brain.

Its label says it is "a powerful blend to promote mental acuity in everyday life & brain health over time."

You take it by the spoonful.

The directions say to shake it well and take two tablespoons a day, and to keep it in the refrigerator once it is open.

The flavor is berry and pomegranate.

The store's page calls it Berry Pomegranate and the bottle calls it Pomegranate Berry, which is the kind of small thing a mail carrier notices and nobody else does.

One bottle holds thirty-two of those two-tablespoon servings.

So at the rate on the label, a quart is a little more than a month of evenings, or mornings, or whenever a man decides to take it.

A quart of berry liquid, two tablespoons a day, thirty-two servings to the bottle.

That was the first line of my notes, and I was already a little surprised.

I had expected a jar of capsules, because that is what most of the bottles on my route used to sound like.

A liquid you measure with a spoon is a different sort of habit.

It asks for a clean tablespoon, a shake, and a cold shelf, and it asks for them every single day.

Split image of a Midwest porch at dusk on the left and a sunny Northwest street on the right
The same minute on Thursday, in two places. Here the porch light was on. Where she lives, the sun was still high.

What She Meant, and What I Heard

I should say plainly why I think she sent it.

At Easter, at her table, I was telling a story about the man who put the new roof on my house, and I could not find his name.

I knew his truck, his dog and the church he goes to.

The name itself stayed just out of reach for most of the afternoon, and it came back to me on the drive home, at the second stop sign, the way names do.

That is an ordinary thing.

Every man I know past sixty has a roofer whose name goes missing now and then.

But a daughter sitting across the table sees it, and she remembers it longer than the father does.

I think the bottle was her way of doing something about a moment that bothered her more than it bothered me.

I don't say that to make light of it.

A gift that comes from worry deserves a careful answer, and a careful answer starts with what is in the glass.

So I wrote a second line on Thursday's page.

Whatever the bottle turned out to be, I would not let it become a quarrel about my memory.

It would be a conversation about a bottle, with facts in it.

That is a much easier conversation to have with a grown child on the telephone.

What did I want from it, if anything?

I wanted what most men my age want.

I want to find the roofer's name when I reach for it, keep my own checkbook, read a whole chapter at night and remember it the next evening.

Those are the ordinary jobs of an ordinary memory.

None of them needs a word you would hear in a clinic.

And I wanted to know whether a quart of berry liquid had any honest business being part of that.

That is the only question the rest of this notebook tries to answer.

Weathered hands cutting the tape of a brown parcel with a pocketknife on a porch table
A carrier opens a box the careful way. Knife along the seam, never through the middle.

Who Makes It, and From Where

Who makes it, and where are they?

The company is Liquid Health, Inc., and its address is 783 Cimarron Court, in Mesquite, Nevada.

I looked Mesquite up on the tablet, and then on the paper road atlas I keep in the truck, which I trust more.

Mesquite is a small town in the far southeast corner of Nevada, close to the Arizona line.

It sits in the desert along the interstate, a long way from anywhere I have ever delivered a letter.

The company prints a telephone number on its site, 1-800-995-6607, and an email address.

It lists its customer service hours as Monday to Friday, eleven in the morning to seven in the evening, Eastern time.

That matters more to a man like me than it might to a younger reader.

I want a number I can call and a person who answers it, and this company gives me the number and the hours plainly.

The site says the product is made in the United States.

It also says the company ships only inside the United States, which answered a question I hadn't asked yet about how my daughter got it to me.

A company with a street, a town, a phone number and business hours. That's a good start.

A small desert town at dusk with low buildings, palm trees and pink mountains behind
The bottle came from a desert town near the Arizona line, a long way from my porch and a long way from hers.

I wrote the address down on the back page, under the questions.

If I ever needed to write to them, I wanted it in ink, not in a tablet I might drop.

Then I wrote one more line, because the carrier in me could not help it.

A quart of liquid in glass, shipped across the desert and half the country in a box that size, had arrived in one piece.

That is good packing, and I have seen a great deal of bad packing.

I gave the company its first mark in my notebook for that alone.

What the Store Says the Bottle Does

What does the store say it does?

This is where a thank-you note has to slow down, because a store's page is written by the people who want to sell the bottle.

That is not a criticism, only a fact about who holds the pen.

The store's page says the product "supports cognitive function and memory."

It also says it can help with energy through the day, and it uses a few other phrases that go further than I would put in a note to my daughter.

The page gives the main credit to vitamin B12.

It says B12 plays a part in the proper functioning of the brain and nervous system, which is a fair description of what that vitamin does in the body.

It also gives credit to vitamin B6, for its part in producing the chemical messengers nerve cells use.

I wrote that down, and I put a small question mark next to it, for a reason that only became clear on Friday.

Then the page makes a claim about the liquid itself.

It says the formula is designed to be absorbed more quickly and efficiently by the body, and a picture on the page says its absorbability is "vastly better" than capsules, tablets and chewables.

I read that sentence three times on the porch.

It is a strong sentence, and the page does not show any study behind it.

I looked for one.

The store doesn't publish a trial comparing its liquid with the same ingredients taken any other way, and I could not find one anywhere else.

So what does "absorbed better" mean on this page?

It means the company believes it.

It is the seller's own sentence, not a measured result, and I would take it the way I take the weather on the radio: worth hearing, not worth betting on.

A liquid is easy to swallow, and for some men that alone is a good reason to prefer it.

My brother-in-law can't manage a large capsule without a full glass of water and a grimace.

But easy to swallow and better absorbed are two different claims.

The first one I can check with my own throat, and the second one would need a laboratory.

Easy to take is a fact you can test at home. Better absorbed is a claim you'd need a lab for.

A brass porch light coming on against white siding at dusk as small moths drift near it
The porch light comes on by itself at dusk. That was when I closed the tablet on Thursday.

The Thing a Tablet Can't Show You

By the time the porch light came on, I had answered three of the seven questions.

I knew what it was, who made it and what the store said about it.

What I didn't know was the most important part.

I didn't know what was actually in the glass.

A store's page will show you the label, but on a small tablet the print is small and the picture is blurry.

I have learned not to read a label from a photograph when the real one is sitting in a box three feet away.

So I left the other four questions for Friday.

I would take the bottle out of its paper, put it on the porch table in good light, and read the real label with my own glasses.

Before I went in to supper, I wrote down one more thing I already knew from the store's page.

The directions say the bottle goes in the refrigerator once it's open, and until it's open, it can sit anywhere cool.

That settled where it would spend the night.

It stayed in its box, in its paper, on the cool floor of the hall closet, next to my boots.

There was one more thing I noticed on Thursday, and it belongs in the notes.

The store's page gives no price I could copy down for keeps, because the price changes with how many bottles you buy and whether you sign up for regular deliveries.

I didn't want to know what she paid, and I still don't.

But I did want to know that the page was plain about how it sells, and it was: one bottle, two, or three, and the choice to have them sent on a schedule.

A carrier learns to respect a shipper who labels a box honestly.

So far, on Thursday, the labeling was honest, and the only strong claim on the page was the one about absorption.

Did I feel foolish, doing all this for a birthday present?

A little, if I'm honest.

My daughter would laugh if she saw me reading a supplement store's page with a pencil behind my ear.

But I thought about all those boxes I left at the ends of all those drives.

I would have liked to think that at least some of the people inside sat down and read what they'd been sent.

It is a kind of respect, reading a thing properly.

Respect for the gift, for the person who sent it, and for yourself.

And it is a kind of patience, which is the one thing a retired man has plenty of.

Four evenings is not long to spend on a thing you are meant to swallow every day for a month.

A cream birthday card standing half open on a wooden desk beside a lamp and a pen
The card stood on my desk all week. The thank-you I owed her waited on the facts.

Friday Evening: The Bottle Comes Out of Its Paper

Friday was clear and cool, the first evening of the year you want a flannel shirt on the porch.

I brought the box out at six, unwrapped the brown paper and set the bottle on the table in the last of the daylight.

It is a handsome bottle, I will give it that.

Tall, amber glass, with a metal screw cap and a white label running most of the way around.

The front of the label has a drawing of a man at a piano, seen from above, and the name in red letters.

Along the sides are small badges for what the company says the liquid has and doesn't have.

The back is what I had come for.

That is where a supplement has to print its panel, the table that lists every ingredient and how much of it is in one serving.

What is actually in it, line by line?

I read the panel twice with my glasses on, and a third time with a magnifying glass from the kitchen drawer.

Here is what it says, in the order it says it.

One serving is two tablespoons, which is one fluid ounce, and it holds five calories and one gram of carbohydrate.

Then come four lines with an amount printed beside each one.

Vitamin E, 7.5 milligrams.

Folate, printed as 7.5 milligrams.

Vitamin B12, 400 micrograms.

Choline, 100 milligrams.

After those four lines come two blends.

The first is named the Memory and Focus Blend, and it weighs 815 milligrams in all.

The second is named for alertness, and it weighs 655 milligrams.

Between them, the two blends hold eleven ingredients, and the panel does not say how much of any single one is in the bottle.

Four lines with a number. Eleven names without one.

Weathered hands shaking a tall amber glass bottle three times and setting it down on a porch table
Shake well. The first instruction on the label, and the easiest one to keep.

Four Lines With a Number Beside Them

The four numbered lines are the part of any panel a careful reader can hold up against what is already known.

So on Friday evening, with the bottle in front of me, I took them one at a time.

Vitamin E, 7.5 milligrams. What is that, and is it much?

It is half of the Daily Value, the reference amount the Food and Drug Administration uses on labels, and the panel prints it as 50 percent.

That is a modest amount, the kind a man gets from ordinary meals with a little nut and seed and oil in them.

The best-known long trial of vitamin E and thinking gave far more than that.

In a trial of 6,377 generally healthy women aged 65 or older, 600 international units taken every other day for up to about nine and a half years brought no benefit to thinking over placebo. [1]

That trial used many times the amount in this bottle, and it was done in women, not men.

But it is the fairest test I found, and it came out even.

So I wrote beside vitamin E: a small, ordinary amount of a vitamin whose biggest trial found nothing for thinking.

That's not a reason to avoid it, only a reason not to expect much from it.

Folate, printed as 7.5 milligrams. Why the magnifying glass?

Because this is the line where the two numbers don't agree with each other.

The panel prints 7.5 milligrams, and beside it, 50 percent of the Daily Value.

The Daily Value for folate on a label is 400 micrograms.

Half of that would be 200 micrograms, and 7.5 milligrams would be many times the whole Daily Value.

The other three numbered lines match their percentages.

Only the folate line doesn't, which means either the amount or the percentage on that line is a printing error.

I can't tell from the label which one it is, and I won't guess.

It is the one line on the bottle I would ask the company about by phone, and I wrote their number beside it.

A brass-rimmed magnifying glass and a yellow pencil lying on a closed notebook on a porch table at dusk
The kitchen drawer's magnifying glass came out on Friday for one line of the panel.

Vitamin B12, 400 micrograms. Why does the panel print a percentage in the thousands?

Because the Daily Value for B12 is small, just 2.4 micrograms. [2]

Four hundred micrograms is about 167 times that, and the panel prints it as 16,667 percent.

A number like that looks startling on a label, but for this vitamin it is common.

The National Institutes of Health notes that B12 has no upper limit set for adults, because it has so little potential to do harm at high intakes. [3]

The same office notes that, depending on how it is measured, somewhere between 3 and 43 percent of older adults living at home run low on B12 by a blood test. [3]

The body's ability to take it from food depends on stomach acid, and many people make less of it as the years go on.

That is why the right first step is a blood test at a regular checkup, not a guess, and if it says a man is low, the amount in this bottle is plenty.

If it says he is fine, the extra is not known to do anything more for his thinking.

There's a large review that looked at exactly that question.

In 2018, a Cochrane review of 14 trials in 27,882 adults with healthy thinking found that B vitamins, including B12 and folic acid, probably make little or no difference to overall thinking over up to five years. [4]

B12 matters when you are low. The blood test is a better question than the bottle.

And vitamin B6, the one the store talked about?

This is the question mark from Thursday.

The store's page gives B6 credit for its part in making the brain's messengers, but B6 does not appear anywhere on the panel of the bottle I was holding.

Maybe the page was written for an earlier formula.

Maybe it is simply a mistake on the page, and I'd guess that's likelier.

Either way, the bottle is the thing you swallow, and the panel is what describes it.

I wrote beside B6: on the store's page, not on the bottle, and the bottle wins.

Choline, 100 milligrams. What is choline?

Choline is a nutrient the body uses to build cell walls and to make acetylcholine, one of the messengers nerve cells use to talk to each other.

The body makes a little of its own, and the rest comes from food, especially eggs, meat and fish.

The panel says this choline comes from choline bitartrate, and the 100 milligrams is 18 percent of the Daily Value.

So it is a real amount, about a fifth of what a man is meant to get from his whole day.

The evidence here comes from food, not from bottles.

In a group of 1,391 adults aged 36 to 83, those who ate more choline in their ordinary diet did better on memory tests. [5]

That was an observational study, which means it found a link, not a cause.

It says a diet with more choline goes along with a better memory score, and it says nothing about adding 100 milligrams from a spoon.

I wrote beside choline: a sensible nutrient, a real amount, and its best evidence is on the breakfast plate.

I thought of the two eggs I have most mornings, and I felt, for once, a little ahead.

Split image of two brown eggs and almonds in lamplight above and a glass of water on a porch rail at dusk below
Two of the four numbered lines have their best evidence on an ordinary plate. The glass of water comes back on Saturday.

Eleven Names Without a Number

After supper on Friday, I went back out with the magnifying glass and the two blends.

This part took longer, because there is less to measure and more to read.

What is in the first blend?

The Memory and Focus Blend, 815 milligrams in all, lists six ingredients.

Aloe vera inner leaf juice, acetyl-L-carnitine, alpha GPC, phosphatidylserine from soy, L-theanine and alpha lipoic acid.

And the second one?

The second blend, 655 milligrams, lists five.

L-tyrosine, DMAE, rhodiola root extract, ginkgo leaf extract and huperzine A, from a Chinese club moss.

Eleven ingredients share 1,470 milligrams, a little less than a gram and a half.

Because the panel gives only the total for each blend, no one reading the label can know how much of any single ingredient is in a serving.

A blend total tells you the size of the crowd, not the weight of any one person in it.

That matters because studies are done at a dose.

A trial gives people a known amount, and the result belongs to that amount, not to any amount.

So for the eleven names, I could only do half the work.

I could read what each ingredient did in its best study, and I could not say whether this bottle holds anything like that study's amount.

What did the studies of those ingredients find?

I will be brief here, because a birthday note has no room for eleven studies, and neither does a porch table.

These are the ones I found in fair trials, with the plain result of each.

L-theanine, an amino acid found in tea leaves.

In a study of Japanese men and women aged 50 to 69 with normal thinking scores, a single dose was linked with faster reactions on an attention task and fewer errors on a working-memory task. [6]

Phosphatidylserine, a fat found in cell walls, here made from soybeans.

In a six-month trial of 78 Japanese adults aged 50 to 69 who were bothered by their memory, scores rose in every group, placebo included, and only those who started lower did better on memory with the real thing. [7]

That soy line caught my eye for a second reason.

The store's page carries a tag saying the product has no soy, and the panel itself says the phosphatidylserine comes from soybeans.

Two stoneware bowls on a wooden table, one of dried green tea leaves and one of dry soybeans
Two of the eleven names come from ordinary pantry things: theanine from the tea leaf, phosphatidylserine from the soybean.

Rhodiola, a root from cold, rocky mountain slopes.

In a study of 56 young hospital residents working night shifts, one tablet a day of a standardized extract was linked with better scores on a set of thinking tests during the first two weeks. [8]

L-tyrosine, an amino acid in ordinary protein.

A 2015 review concluded that it seems to help thinking mainly in short, demanding situations, when the body's supply of certain messengers is running temporarily low, and that its use outside those situations looks limited. [9]

Ginkgo, from the leaves of a very old kind of tree.

In a trial of 3,069 adults aged 72 to 96 followed for about six years, 120 milligrams twice a day did no better than placebo on memory, attention, language or planning. [10]

The National Institutes of Health says plainly that there is no conclusive evidence ginkgo helps with any health condition. [11]

That is a large trial and a plain sentence, and I wrote both down.

Low yellow-flowered rhodiola plants growing between gray stones on a mountain slope at dusk
Rhodiola grows on cold, stony ground. Its best study was in young hospital residents on night duty, a long way from a porch in September.

I wrote on Friday's page: eleven names, two totals, no amounts.

Read the studies for what they are, and don't pretend the bottle matches them.

The Two Lines I Would Carry to the Pharmacy Counter

Is there anything I should show the pharmacist first?

Yes, and this is the part of the bottle I would ask any man to read most slowly.

Two of the eleven names act on the body in ways that can matter to someone who takes anything else every day.

Huperzine A is the first.

It is a compound from a Chinese club moss, and it slows the enzyme that breaks down acetylcholine, the same messenger that choline helps build.

In a study of healthy adults, with twelve people in each group, single doses of 100 or 200 micrograms slowed that enzyme, measured in the blood. [12]

The higher dose held recall steady across sessions, and neither dose improved overall performance on the full set of tests.

That tells me huperzine A does something real to the body.

It acts the way a medicine acts, not the way a food does, and some everyday medicines work on the same enzyme.

The panel doesn't say how much huperzine A is in a serving.

That is the single best reason to put this bottle on the counter in front of a pharmacist before the first tablespoon.

Ginkgo is the second.

The National Institutes of Health lists it among the supplements worth asking about if you take anything daily, and a pharmacist can tell you in a minute whether that includes you. [11]

I will not print a list of which daily medicines those are.

A list on a page like this is a poor substitute for someone who can see your own cabinet.

Two names on this label belong in front of a pharmacist. Take the bottle, not a photograph of it.

I take two things every day myself, both of them ordinary and both written on a card in my wallet.

On Saturday morning I drove the bottle into town, in its box, and showed the panel and my card to the pharmacist at the counter where I have bought everything for twenty years.

What we talked about was my own card, so I will keep it to myself.

But I will say that it took four minutes, cost nothing, and was the most useful four minutes of the week.

If your pharmacist can't tell you how much huperzine A is in a serving, and they won't be able to from this panel, the company's phone number is on its site.

I wrote it on the back page for the third time.

What Eighteen Other Buyers Wrote

On Friday night, after the blends, I went back to the tablet one more time.

The store's page carries reviews from people who bought the bottle, and I wanted to hear from someone who had actually taken it.

There were eighteen reviews when the listing was read, with an average of about four and two-thirds stars.

Thirteen gave five stars, four gave four, and one gave three.

Most were marked by the review service as coming from people who had bought it.

One of the five-star reviews said the person had never received the product, which tells you something about how much weight to give a star.

I picked four that seemed to me the most useful to a man deciding about a gift.

They are copied exactly as written, including the two that are lukewarm, and the portraits beside them are illustrations, not the reviewers.

Illustrative portrait, not the reviewer
Lisa N. Confirmed Buyer
★★★★★
NeuroLogic is one of my go-to brain health supports. I will always have it in my health cupboard. I've tried many supplements - most I wouldn't buy again. This one I've bought several times, 3 or 4 bottles each time.
Illustrative portrait, not the reviewer
Jennifer S. Confirmed Buyer
★★★★☆
This is a great combination. Unfortunately, I am having a bit of trouble getting used to the taste. I do appreciate that they have tried to give this a good flavor; I am just not into it.
Illustrative portrait, not the reviewer
Horace C. Confirmed Buyer
★★★☆☆
Taste is very tolerable. We have almost finished the bottle. Have not seen a difference that we can tell.
Illustrative portrait, not the reviewer
Mitchell R. Confirmed Buyer
★★★★☆
The product I purchased seems to be effective and works. So far so good. But need more time to feel how effective it actually is. But would buy this product again.

Lisa has bought it again and again, which is the strongest thing a buyer can say.

Jennifer likes the idea and struggles with the taste, which was worth knowing about a gift I would have to swallow every day.

Horace, and whoever shares the bottle with him, finished most of it and could not tell a difference.

That is the most honest review on the page, and I was glad the store left it up.

Mitchell thinks it works, wants more time to be sure, and would buy it again.

That is about where most honest people land after one bottle of anything.

One repeat buyer, one taste complaint, one "no difference," one "too soon to say." That sounds like real people.

None of the four is a study, but together they say the taste matters and a month is a short time.

I put the bottle back in its box, still sealed, and wrote across the bottom of the page: taste it before deciding, and give it more than a week.

Saturday Evening: What a Gift Costs When It Doesn't Suit

If it doesn't suit me, what does it cost her?

This is the question nobody asks about a gift, and it is the one I had been saving.

When you buy a thing for yourself and don't like it, you lose your own money, and when someone buys it for you, you lose theirs.

So on Saturday evening, back from town, I read the store's policy the way I would read a contract.

It is short and plain, which I appreciated.

The store makes a thirty-day promise.

If a customer isn't happy with the product for any reason, including the taste, the packaging or how it works, they can call or write within thirty days of buying it.

Then comes the part I underlined twice.

The store will exchange it for another product or give a store credit; the policy does not say it will return the money.

And it covers only purchases made directly on the store's own website.

The store's own questions page says the bottle is also sold on Amazon, at Walmart and in some health food stores, and those purchases are not covered by this promise.

Thirty days, an exchange or a store credit, and only if it was bought on the store's own site.

For a gift, those three facts matter a great deal.

The thirty days start on the day she bought it, not the day I opened it, and she bought it the week before my birthday.

The exchange or the credit would go to her, as the buyer, not to me.

And if she bought it somewhere other than the company's own site, the promise wouldn't apply at all.

So the most useful question I could ask my daughter on Sunday was not "why did you send this," but "where did you buy it."

I wrote that on Saturday's page in capital letters.

The store ships only inside the United States, with a standard rate and a faster one.

That would matter to her only if she wanted to send a second bottle, or trade this one for something else.

The quart she mailed me, and how it is sold

Neurologic

A liquid blend of vitamins, choline and eleven botanical and amino-acid ingredients, poured out two tablespoons at a time from an amber glass bottle.

SEE THE QUART ON THE MAKER'S STORE

Sold by Liquid Health, Inc., Mesquite, Nevada · 32 fl oz, thirty-two servings of two tablespoons · shake well, refrigerate after opening · a thirty-day exchange or store credit on direct purchases · ships inside the United States only

The First Two Tablespoons

I opened it on Saturday evening, after the policy, and after the pharmacist.

It seemed only fair to the gift to taste it before I called to thank her for it.

I shook it well, the way the label says, and measured two level tablespoons with a real measuring spoon.

Two tablespoons is one fluid ounce, and a kitchen spoon from the drawer holds a good deal less than a measuring tablespoon does.

The color is a dark berry red, and it smells of fruit.

The taste is sweet and a little tart, like a thin berry syrup with something slightly bitter underneath it.

I understood Jennifer's review at once.

It is not unpleasant, but it is not a taste you would choose for its own sake, and I could see how some people would struggle with it every day.

The store's own questions page says it can be mixed into a drink.

A splash of it in a small glass of cold water went down more easily for me than it did straight from the spoon.

Then I put the cap back on and put the bottle in the refrigerator, on the door, where the label says it belongs once it's open.

I wrote on Saturday's page: it tastes like a berry syrup, mixes well with water, and needs its cold shelf from now on.

Did I feel anything?

No, and I would have been suspicious if I had.

Two tablespoons of anything on a Saturday evening is not going to tell a man about his memory, and the label doesn't say it will.

The Cheaper Things She Already Gave Me

Late on Saturday, with the porch light on and the bottle in the refrigerator, I added one last list to the week.

It was a list of things my daughter had already given me over the years, without mailing a box.

She made me start drinking water in the evening, after a long summer afternoon when I'd done nothing but coffee.

She taught me to cook a real supper instead of eating out of cans, and she was the one who got me walking the road again after her mother died.

Those are small things.

They also happen to be the things with some of the best evidence behind them.

What do the studies say about water?

In a long German study of 1,111 adults aged 60 to 89, those who were measurably short of water scored lower and slid further on a test of how quickly the mind processes things. [13]

That was an observational study, so it shows a link, not a cause.

A 2021 review of 18 studies in adults over 60 found some evidence, though not much, linking being short of water with poorer thinking. [14]

It is not strong evidence, but a glass of water costs nothing and has no label to misprint.

And the supper plate?

In a three-year trial of 604 older adults with normal thinking, a Mediterranean-style diet and a plainer control diet with a little less food both improved thinking scores, and they did about equally well. [15]

What seemed to matter was eating better and a little less, not one special food.

In a large Brazilian study of 10,775 adults followed for about eight years, those who ate the most heavily processed food saw their thinking scores fall faster than those who ate the least. [16]

That, too, was observational, but it points the same way as the trial.

A plate of baked salmon, green beans and rice with a glass of water on a wooden table in lamplight
A plain supper and a glass of water. The best evidence on this page is on this plate.

I am saying that if I had to keep only one list, I would keep the one she gave me without a box.

And I thought she deserved to hear that, too.

READ THE LABEL ON THE STORE'S PAGE

Liquid Health, Inc. · 1-800-995-6607 · Monday to Friday, 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. Eastern · exchange or store credit within thirty days on direct purchases

Sunday Evening: The Call

She called at six on Sunday, which is three in the afternoon where she lives.

I had my notebook open on the side table, and I had meant to call her, but she has always been quicker than me at that.

I thanked her first, and I meant it.

Then I told her I had read the whole bottle, and she laughed, because of course I had.

I told her it was a real product from a real company in a small desert town, with a phone number that people answer.

I told her the label has four lines with numbers and eleven names without them, and that I had shown it to the pharmacist before the first spoonful.

I told her the folate line doesn't add up and that I'd be asking the company about it.

And I told her the taste is like a thin berry syrup, and that a splash in cold water helps.

Then I asked her where she had bought it.

It turned out she had ordered it from the company's own site, so the thirty-day promise applied, and the exchange or the credit would be hers.

I told her what the reviews said, the good one and the one that noticed no difference.

And I told her that I would take it for the quart, the full thirty-two servings, and tell her honestly at the end whether I thought it had earned a second.

A thank-you that says something true about the gift. My mother would have approved.

Near the end, she asked if I was drinking enough water.

I said I was, and I was holding a glass of it when she asked.

What would I tell another father in the same chair?

I would tell him to read it before he thanks her.

Not because the bottle is likely to be wrong, but because reading it is the honest way to accept it.

I would tell him to take the bottle to his pharmacist before the first spoonful, because of the club moss and the ginkgo.

And I would tell him to ask where it was bought, because the store's promise depends on it.

Then I would tell him to call her, and to say something true.

That is all a thank-you note ever had to do.

Short answers from the porch

Is this a medicine?

No. It is a dietary supplement sold as a liquid, and it is not meant for any health condition.

How do you take it?

Shake well and take two tablespoons a day. Keep it in the refrigerator once it is open.

How long does one bottle last?

Thirty-two servings of two tablespoons, a little more than a month at the label's rate.

Why show it to the pharmacist first?

Because of two names in the blends, huperzine A and ginkgo, which can matter if you take anything daily. [12]

Can the store take it back?

Within thirty days it exchanges the bottle or gives store credit, only for direct purchases on its site. It does not say it returns the money.

Does it contain soy?

The panel says the phosphatidylserine comes from soybeans, whatever the store's tag says.

Where does it ship?

Only inside the United States.

The Four Evenings, on One Page

If I had to fit the whole week on one page of the evening ledger, this is what I would copy out.

  • Thursday: a quart of berry liquid from Liquid Health of Mesquite, Nevada, taken two tablespoons a day.
  • Thursday: the store says it is absorbed better than capsules, and shows no study that compares them.
  • Friday: four lines with a number, vitamin E, folate, B12 and choline, and the folate line doesn't add up.
  • Friday: B6 is on the store's page but not on the panel, and the panel wins.
  • Friday: eleven names in two blends, 1,470 milligrams in all, with no amount for any one of them.
  • Friday: huperzine A and ginkgo go in front of the pharmacist first.
  • Friday: four real reviews, one of them noticing no difference.
  • Saturday: thirty days, an exchange or a store credit, and only for direct purchases.
  • Saturday: water, a plain supper and a walk still have the better evidence.
  • Sunday: say thank you, and say something true.

The Porch Light Goes Off

I am writing the end of this on Monday evening, with the bottle in the refrigerator door and two tablespoons of it gone for the second time.

The hayfield across the road has been cut, and the light goes gold across the stubble now instead of the grass.

I don't know yet what the bottle will do for me, and I've been careful not to pretend I do.

Nobody has run a study of this liquid, and the studies of its ingredients were done at doses the label doesn't let me check.

What I know is what's in it, who makes it, what it costs my daughter if I don't like it, and what I should have asked before the first spoonful.

That is what she deserved to have me know, and it is what I would want any father to know about a bottle from his child.

If you have a bottle like this in a box on your porch table tonight, from a son or a daughter who worries a little, read it before you call.

It makes the thank-you truer, and it takes about four evenings.

And if you decide the bottle isn't for you, say that too, kindly, and tell them about the glass of water you're holding.

In my experience, a grown child who worries is glad to hear either one, as long as it is true.

A rural front porch at night in blue moonlight with a rocking chair and a closed notebook on a side table
Monday night on the porch. The card is still on the desk inside, and the thank-you has been said.

A quart, thirty-two tablespoons, and a label worth four evenings

Neurologic

A liquid blend of vitamins, choline and eleven botanical and amino-acid ingredients, poured out two tablespoons at a time from an amber glass bottle.

SEE THE QUART ON THE MAKER'S STORE

Liquid Health, Inc., 783 Cimarron Ct, Mesquite, Nevada · 1-800-995-6607 · show the panel to your pharmacist before the first spoonful

Every line of the panel, the four with an amount and the eleven inside the two blends, is written out with its plain English name and what its best study found in the ingredient and advertising guide linked at the foot of this page.

The guide also explains the folate line whose two numbers don't agree, and why huperzine A and ginkgo belong in front of a pharmacist.

References

16 sources, numbered in order of appearance.

  1. Kang J.H. et al. (2006). Archives of Internal Medicine 166(22):2462-2468 doi.org
  2. US Food and Drug Administration. "Daily Value on the Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels" (content current as of 2024-03-05) fda.gov
  3. NIH Office of Dietary Supplements. "Vitamin B12: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals" (updated July 2, 2025) ods.od.nih.gov
  4. Rutjes A.W.S. et al. (2018). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD011906 doi.org
  5. Poly C. et al. (2011). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 94(6):1584-1591 doi.org
  6. Baba Y. et al. (2021). Journal of Medicinal Food 24(4):333-341 doi.org
  7. Kato-Kataoka A. et al. (2010). Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition 47(3):246-255 doi.org
  8. Darbinyan V. et al. (2000). Phytomedicine 7(5):365-371 doi.org
  9. Jongkees B.J. et al. (2015). Journal of Psychiatric Research 70:50-57 doi.org
  10. Snitz B.E. et al. (2009). JAMA 302(24):2663-2670 doi.org
  11. NIH NCCIH. "Ginkgo" (updated February 2025) nccih.nih.gov
  12. Morasch K.C. et al. (2015). Physiology & Behavior 138:165-172 doi.org
  13. Mantantzis K. et al. (2020). Psychology and Aging 35(4):517-528 doi.org
  14. Edmonds C.J. et al. (2021). Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 95:104380 doi.org
  15. Barnes L.L. et al. (2023). New England Journal of Medicine 389(7):602-611 doi.org
  16. Gonçalves N.G. et al. (2023). JAMA Neurology 80(2):142-150 doi.org